2 weeks for standard apps. 4+ weeks for complex ones.
That is how long teams can wait for a security report before remediation starts.
stray
Security that keeps pace with every release.
An agentic platform that evolves with your application, continuously testing it
and delivering up-to-date pentest reports on demand.
Backed by
×
×The security gap
Features ship faster than security can validate them.
Security scanners trigger a lot of alerts
Verifying their alerts can consume up to 20% of your team's weekly work hours, yet scanners remain part of many compliance programs.
A pentest report costs €8K to €20K
One report, no remediation follow-up, and 30% to 50% of identified vulnerabilities left unresolved.
249 days to remediate high-risk findings
The slowest 10% of teams take an average of 249 days to fix high-risk vulnerabilities.
The solution
Security context that gets more useful over time.
- 01
Scope, enter your URL, and start the agents
First findings are guaranteed within hours of starting the assessment, with every trace and attack path available in real time.
- 02
Self-improving context
Memory combines historical knowledge with the latest application signals, so routes, trust boundaries, and changes stay up to date across every release.
- 03
Pentest reports on demand
Receive your first report in under 2 days, then generate an up-to-date report whenever you need it, validated by pentesters holding OSCP or more advanced certifications.
- 04
Runtime validation, replays, and ready patches
Validate findings against the running application, review ready patches, and replay attacks after remediation to confirm each fix.
- 05
Scheduled jobs
Run agents every day, on every release, or whenever Stray detects an application change.
- 06
Continuous supply-chain monitoring
Monitor your software supply chain and test new dependency vulnerabilities for real-world exploitability, including whether they can bypass your WAF.
How Stray platform works
From one domain to evidence you can use
Stray platform turns a target URL into application context, a threat model, coordinated testing, and validated findings.
Build the context before testing starts.
Stray discovers the reachable application, gathers its public signals, and lets you add the context agents need to test with intent.
Global setup · target:
app.example.com›Extensions9 available
✓
Subdomain discovery
Enumerate subdomains within your approved scope.
✓
Dependabot alerts
Bring dependency vulnerabilities into the assessment context.
—
OpenAPI specification
Add your API contract to widen the known surface.
✓
Probe target
Capture technology signals and reachable paths.
✓
Crawl endpoints
Collect the routes and parameters available in scope.
✓
GitHub repository context
Map repositories, workflows, and deployment metadata.
✓
Cloudflare alerts
Include edge security signals and relevant events.
✓
Sitemap and robots
Surface intended crawl boundaries and public routes.
—
Authentication context
Add test accounts and session rules when they are available.
Understand what is worth testing.
Stray translates the application context into assets, trust boundaries, and the workflows behind business-logic attack paths so testing has a useful plan.
Threat model — app.example.com
Scope: public web application · authenticated routes included
System model
- Assets — customer data, sessions, API keys, billing records
- Trust boundaries — browser ↔ edge ↔ app ↔ data services
- Priority paths — sign in, account recovery, payments, admin controls
Testing focus
authorization session handling input boundaries business logic
Run the right tests against the right surface.
Agents work from the model, cover distinct attack paths, and retain context as they investigate rather than firing isolated scanner checks.
Agent taskFocusScopeStatus
Test account recovery flowAuthentication/reset-passwordRunning
Explore object access controlsAuthorization/api/projects/*Complete
Replay payment boundaryBusiness logic/api/billing/*Queued
Review client exposureInformation exposurepublic bundlesComplete
Review what is real, with the evidence attached.
Findings include impact, affected routes, and replayable proof so your team can decide what to fix without sorting through noise.
6 findings
IDOR exposes invoices from another workspace
Critical 9.1Review/api/billing/invoices/:invoiceId · billing records affected
Billing seat limit can be exceeded without a subscription update
High 8.4Valid/api/billing/seats · replay available
Public bundle exposes internal service metadata
Medium 6.2Reviewapp assets · 3 components
Stay in control
Start security testing without losing control of the assessment.
You decide what is in scope and when to involve us. We make the result easier to review, not harder to trust.
- 01
Authorized scope only
Only assess applications and systems you own or have explicit permission to test.
- 02
Scope before commitment
For a pentest, agree targets, access, and objectives before the assessment begins.
- 03
Start with one application
Use the continuous plan on a single app before expanding security coverage.
- 04
Evidence before action
Review validated findings and replayable proof before your team prioritizes a remediation.
Questions
Before your first assessment
What happens after I enter my app domain?
Upon your authorization, we can run a first assessment of your application without accessing its source code. We use non-destructive methods and remain within the approved scope.
What can we test autonomously?
We focus on web application testing today. Our capabilities autonomously test APIs, authentication flows, logic attacks, and business-logic attacks to provide fuller application coverage.
Can we test authenticated flows?
Yes. Provide approved test accounts and we can include authenticated routes and workflows in the agreed assessment scope.
Do I need authorization?
Yes. You must own the application or have explicit permission to assess it before any testing begins.
How are findings validated?
We validate a potential issue against the running application before presenting it as a finding, so your team can focus on evidence rather than noise.
What do I receive with a validated finding?
Each finding includes the affected context, impact, remediation direction, and a replayable proof of concept for your team to review.
How do replays confirm a remediation?
After a fix, replay the affected finding to check whether the vulnerable behavior is no longer present and retain the result as evidence.
What changes with a scoped pentest?
The continuous plan lets you run agents against your application to understand its exposure. A scoped pentest adds agreed targets, access, and objectives; scheduled reassessments after changes such as merged PRs; validated reports as findings are confirmed; and a dedicated engineering team to review the work with you.
Take the next step